편입영어 · 조건 방향과 반례 검산

학교·대학 공식 기출이 아닌 독자 제작 연습문항입니다. 기존 글에서 다룬 학습 원리를 확인하며, 실제 시험범위·배점과는 별개입니다.

1. 기금의 규정에 비추어 반드시 참인 것은?

연습 배점 25점

A foundation will consider an application only if the proposed restoration has the consent of the building's owner. Consent does not assure funding: the panel must also examine the plan's cost and historical significance. Last year several eligible projects were rejected because their budgets could not be justified. This year the foundation has introduced a separate preliminary meeting at which applicants may ask questions before seeking the owner's consent. Attendance at that meeting is not a funding application and carries no promise of eligibility. The director hopes the meeting will help applicants identify problems early, without weakening the conditions that govern the panel's formal decisions.

1. An application without owner consent will not receive formal consideration.2. A project receiving owner consent will receive funding.3. An applicant must obtain consent before attending the preliminary meeting.4. A historically significant project need not justify its budget.5. A rejected project must have lacked owner consent.

2. 글의 내용과 일치하는 사례는?

연습 배점 25점

1. The panel funds a restoration before the owner has consented.2. The foundation treats meeting attendance as a completed application.3. An owner-approved project is declined after its budget is examined.4. An applicant is guaranteed funding after revising a historical description.5. The foundation cancels formal review because preliminary advice is available.

3. 안전 담당자가 지적한 보고서의 논리적 오류는?

연습 배점 25점

In a seed bank, access to the cold store is permitted only if a supervisor is present. During a power failure, Mara entered under the supervision of the collection manager to move vulnerable samples. A later report claimed that anyone accompanied by a supervisor must be allowed inside. The safety officer objected: accompaniment removes one obstacle, but researchers still need training and a valid task. The report had converted a restriction into a guarantee. A supervisor may therefore be present during a visit that is refused for another reason, whereas an authorised entry without supervision would violate the stated rule.

1. It inferred the absence of training from the presence of a supervisor.2. It treated a necessary condition as if it were sufficient for permission.3. It assumed that supervision prevented every kind of equipment failure.4. It confused permission to remove samples with ownership of those samples.5. It inferred that Mara entered alone because the power had failed.

4. 규칙을 위반하는 상황으로 가장 적절한 것은?

연습 배점 25점

1. A trained researcher is refused entry despite a supervisor’s presence.2. A supervisor accompanies a researcher whose task has been approved.3. A researcher waits outside until the supervisor arrives.4. A trained researcher is authorised to enter while no supervisor is present.5. A supervisor is present but entry is withheld because training is incomplete.

콘텐츠·수업 설계: 최세진 영어 · 베라진(Verajin) · 베라딕트